----- Original Message ----- > From: "Karsten Wade" <kwade at redhat.com> > To: centos-devel at centos.org > Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 11:57:24 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] moving from gitorious > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/06/2015 07:21 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > On 03/05/2015 09:26 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: > >> I'll give a +0 explained this way: > >> > >> There is a risk with using GitHub's services under a few > >> conditions: > >> > >> * We get reliant on the proprietary workflow software. * We allow > >> it to become a canonical source. * Our use of the service is seen > >> as tacit or explicit support of their company or model of working > >> with open source software. > > > > as we move from gitorious.org, so we can move from github should > > there be a need. > > Thanks, yes, that's the gist of it. > > I appreciate greatly that everyone here understands the value of open > source and avoiding lock-in and such. I'll often make a point about > such things just to "wave the flag" so to speak -- make a clear point > in the public record about our stance on freedom, etc. So if people > say, in this example, "Look, CentOS Project is embracing GitHub," we > have a discussion thread to point to. Should we be more explicitly considering gitlab.com then? There's a conversion path from gitorious. Jason > > Regards, > > - - Karsten > - -- > Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff > http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com > @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > > iEUEARECAAYFAlT6BqQACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEEeXQCXSPFoNecToWgwcbQ2Y/XWEW7+ > FgCfeWTMxiJOzspMKh0VSFs5JQfNRxQ= > =fjXi > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >