-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/15 10:18, Niels de Vos wrote: > Hi Gluster users running on CentOS! > > As you may have heard before, we're planning on providing stable > Gluster releases and related packages through the CentOS Storage > SIG [0]. We would like to know what version of Gluster and which > versions of CentOS are most wanted by our users. > > The current support for Gluster defines 3 stable releases at the > time. This means that 3.7, 3.6 and 3.5 are supported by the Gluster > Community. Once 3.8 is released, 3.5 will become unsupported and > will not receive any updates anymore. 3.8 is planned to be released > early 2016 [1]. > > We can provide all Gluster packages for CentOS-7 and 6, but > CentOS-5 can only get recent versions of the Gluster client. > > Now, we want to know which combinations our users like to see in > the CentOS Storage SIG: > > - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.7: latest and greatest, will be included - > CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.7: very much used release, also included > > - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.6: some users, you? - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS > 3.6: some users, you? > > - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.5: fewer users, you? - CentOS-6 + > GlusterFS 3.5: fewer users, you? > > - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.7 (client only): nobody? - CentOS-5 + > GlusterFS 3.6: nobody? - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.5: nobody? > > > Please speak up and let us know what versions you depend on for > next few months. You can reply to this email to the list (note that > it is x-posted, one mailinglist is sufficient for your reply), > directly to me or over IRC in #centos-devel or #gluster. > > Many thanks, Niels > > > 0. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage 1. > https://www.gluster.org/community/roadmap/ Hi Niels, I guess that's also a decision to take at the Storage SIG level, but (my opinion) I'd think that targeting CentOS 6 and 7 would make sense, and Gluster 3.6/3.7 (we still rely on Gluster 3.6 on CentOS 6 ourselves within the CentOS infra) I don't think that having CentOS 5 would make sense, but can be done probably if there is "demand" for it. It would be then "interesting" as our Koji build farm (cbs.centos.org) only covers 6 and 7 (and we had no plan on building for 5 anymore, at least from SIGs perspective) - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlZBxe0ACgkQnVkHo1a+xU5z+wCfZatVXgaJxoN1+sQg/Wphg7i+ qnwAn3631W2TtONT5SXn7qXJ38efD9JR =iBGY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----