Hi Niels, Whichever version you think will last longer and can be seamlessly upgraded. We still run 3.4 in production, because an upgrade requires downtime we can't afford. :-) I wouldn't like to hit the same problems with future versions hence the above. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Niels de Vos" <ndevos at redhat.com> > To: centos-devel at centos.org, gluster-users at gluster.org > Sent: Tuesday, 10 November, 2015 09:18:08 > Subject: [Gluster-users] What Gluster versions would you like to see in the CentOS Storage SIG? > Hi Gluster users running on CentOS! > > As you may have heard before, we're planning on providing stable Gluster > releases and related packages through the CentOS Storage SIG [0]. We > would like to know what version of Gluster and which versions of CentOS > are most wanted by our users. > > The current support for Gluster defines 3 stable releases at the time. > This means that 3.7, 3.6 and 3.5 are supported by the Gluster Community. > Once 3.8 is released, 3.5 will become unsupported and will not receive > any updates anymore. 3.8 is planned to be released early 2016 [1]. > > We can provide all Gluster packages for CentOS-7 and 6, but CentOS-5 can > only get recent versions of the Gluster client. > > Now, we want to know which combinations our users like to see in the > CentOS Storage SIG: > > - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.7: latest and greatest, will be included > - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.7: very much used release, also included > > - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.6: some users, you? > - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.6: some users, you? > > - CentOS-7 + GlusterFS 3.5: fewer users, you? > - CentOS-6 + GlusterFS 3.5: fewer users, you? > > - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.7 (client only): nobody? > - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.6: nobody? > - CentOS-5 + GlusterFS 3.5: nobody? > > > Please speak up and let us know what versions you depend on for next few > months. You can reply to this email to the list (note that it is > x-posted, one mailinglist is sufficient for your reply), directly to me > or over IRC in #centos-devel or #gluster. > > Many thanks, > Niels > > > 0. https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage > 1. https://www.gluster.org/community/roadmap/ > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users