[CentOS-devel] centos/7 vagrant box: Could not find a controller named 'IDE Controller'
Laurentiu Pancescu
lpancescu at gmail.com
Thu Dec 15 10:26:35 UTC 2016
On 15/12/16 00:18, Marcin Dulak wrote:
> I'm still thinking there can be something in centos box.ovf that makes it
> vulnerable to such changes.
> Someone familiar with the specification should be able to comment on this.
> In the meantime I created an issue with vagrant:
> https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues/8105
> Are you getting the correct boot order from centos/7 as described in the
> vagrant issue?
No, I get the default boot order:
boot1="floppy"
boot2="dvd"
boot3="disk"
boot4="none"
I see other settings imported correctly by VirtualBox (memory, cpus,
storage controllers, network), and it doesn't display any error or
warning if I import it manually:
$ VBoxManage import
~/.vagrant.d/boxes/centos-VAGRANTSLASH-7/1610.01/virtualbox/box.ovf
0%...10%...20%...30%...40%...50%...60%...70%...80%...90%...100%
Interpreting
/Users/laur/.vagrant.d/boxes/centos-VAGRANTSLASH-7/1610.01/virtualbox/box.ovf...
OK.
Disks:
vmdisk1 42949672960 -1
http://www.vmware.com/interfaces/specifications/vmdk.html#streamOptimized
centos-7-1-1.x86_64.vmdk -1 -1
Virtual system 0:
0: Suggested OS type: "RedHat_64"
(change with "--vsys 0 --ostype <type>"; use "list ostypes" to list
all possible values)
1: Suggested VM name "centos-7-1-1.x86_64"
(change with "--vsys 0 --vmname <name>")
2: Number of CPUs: 1
(change with "--vsys 0 --cpus <n>")
3: Guest memory: 512 MB
(change with "--vsys 0 --memory <MB>")
4: Network adapter: orig NAT, config 3, extra type=NAT
5: IDE controller, type PIIX4
(disable with "--vsys 0 --unit 5 --ignore")
6: IDE controller, type PIIX4
(disable with "--vsys 0 --unit 6 --ignore")
7: Hard disk image: source image=centos-7-1-1.x86_64.vmdk, target
path=/Users/laur/VirtualBox
VMs/centos-7-1-1.x86_64/centos-7-1-1.x86_64.vmdk, controller=5;channel=0
(change target path with "--vsys 0 --unit 7 --disk path";
disable with "--vsys 0 --unit 7 --ignore")
0%...10%...20%...30%...40%...50%...60%...70%...80%...90%...100%
Successfully imported the appliance.
The Debian images don't even bother to specify a boot order, I doubt it
makes a difference in practice. But if you think it's important, you
can file a bug report against Image Factory (imgfac.org) - such a change
would have to be made upstream.
Best regards,
Laurențiu
More information about the CentOS-devel
mailing list