On 13 Dec 12:12, Colin Walters wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: > > > I want to discuss diverging from RHEL AH by not including the > > kubernetes-node pkg in our downstream image. This would allow users to > > install a newer version of the kubernetes-node, such as this 1.4.5 > > version from my copr[3] that I hope to see move into the virt-sig > > soon. > > Right. The disadvantage to this is...that people who have masters set > up for 1.3 will need to use layering or a container for node. > > I'm uncertain, because it seems like a major point of CentOS Core > builds is fidelity, even bug-for-bug, and this is a major difference. This is not CentOS core. I think if we can provide something that fits the user best than upstream, we should to it. Maybe however we should adopt another name. > > To be clear, you're just talking about -node, not etcd/flannel for example? > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Config Management SIG V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 213 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20161213/7261c3da/attachment-0008.sig>