On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 10:49 +0000, Trevor Hemsley wrote: > On 16/12/16 10:37, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > On 15/12/16 23:43, Phil Wyett wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> How is the core SIG looking at improving and speeding up (more than one > >> person) builds of updates? As I see it the longer the time between > >> vendor release and CentOS release people know that we are hittable if > >> they have a viable exploit? > >> > >> I ask this as I see that the core SIG is not concentrating on the job at > >> hand and concentrating on the work of their new masters - Red Hats > >> CentOS? Their heads are in the cloud. ;-) > > unsure if this is a troll post or you actually meant to raise tangiable > > concerns ? > > > > > > I am in complete agreement. > > 7.3.1611 took 39 days from the upstream release which is 2 weeks longer > than the previous el7 drops. > > The latest https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2946.html which is a > critical update for firefox released on the 14th is still not released > for CentOS 7 after 2 days. > > It appears the core team have lost focus on what's important. The SIG > stuff should be peripheral. The altarch stuff should be peripheral. > Concentrate on what's important - it's the DISTRO. The rest of it may be > nice to have but the important part is the core of the distro. Anything > else is just distraction. > > Trevor Total agreement. Regards Phil -- Google+: https://plus.google.com/+PhilWyett Blog: https://philwyett-hemi.blogspot.co.uk/ GitLab: https://gitlab.com/philwyett_hemi/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20161216/d50cce5b/attachment-0008.sig>