On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 10/06/16 23:08, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 09/06/16 15:24, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: >>> >>> So, pick one. CentOS Virt SIG docker will have: >>> >>> 1. Fedora rpm rebuilt >>> OR >>> 2. RHEL rpms (docker + docker-latest) rebuilt (consider it a preview or >>> something before official release) >>> OR >>> 3. Something else, maybe both Fedora and RHEL versions clearly separated by >>> koji tags >>> >> >> What would the user experience look like here ? >> >> > > as in, how do we tell the user that these options exist, what the story > is, broadly, for each - and how they can consume them ? For one thing, I'd want to include a newer docker in our devel/continuous release (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Devel) of centos atomic host, and it seems that having the coming-soon-to-extras docker would be a good fit for that image. Beyond that, and other testing-type uses, I don't know that we'd necessarily want to advertise / promote these packages, but having them available would still be useful. > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel