On 10/06/16 23:37, Jason Brooks wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >> On 10/06/16 23:08, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> On 09/06/16 15:24, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: >>>> >>>> So, pick one. CentOS Virt SIG docker will have: >>>> >>>> 1. Fedora rpm rebuilt >>>> OR >>>> 2. RHEL rpms (docker + docker-latest) rebuilt (consider it a preview or >>>> something before official release) >>>> OR >>>> 3. Something else, maybe both Fedora and RHEL versions clearly separated by >>>> koji tags >>>> >>> >>> What would the user experience look like here ? >>> >>> >> >> as in, how do we tell the user that these options exist, what the story >> is, broadly, for each - and how they can consume them ? > > For one thing, I'd want to include a newer docker in our > devel/continuous release > (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Devel) of centos > atomic host, and it seems that having the coming-soon-to-extras docker > would be a good fit for that image. > > Beyond that, and other testing-type uses, I don't know that we'd > necessarily want to advertise / promote these packages, but having > them available would still be useful. > sounds good. I guess we start with keeping it to the builds we care about from the provider side, and then expand exposure ( blog posts, social media etc ) point people at these and ask for upstream projects adoption as we mature. regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc