[CentOS-devel] sig-configmgt SCL Prefixes

[Julien Pivotto]

On 12 May 11:04, BC wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie at inuits.eu> wrote:
> >
> > Please remember that ze do not plan to expose that to users (e.g puppet
> > will be installed in /usr, not in a SCL). However, those SCL will be
> > used for dependencies and/or rebuilds of EPEL packages.
> 
> The big headline on softwarecollections.org is:
> 
> All versions of any software on your system. Together.
> 
> That is how I have always understood it. So how would installing to
> /usr fit the SCL paradigm? Or has the SCL paradigm changed?

We are not the SCL sig. We do not plan to let you install multiple
versions of Puppet at the same time on your system.

Maybe a better way to rephrase it is:

which prefix will we use for our dependencies that are not packagable in
the system?


-- 
 (o-    Julien Pivotto
 //\    Config Management SIG
 V_/_   https://frama.link/cfgmgmt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 303 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20160512/84a25cf9/attachment.sig>