[CentOS-devel] sig-configmgt SCL Prefixes

[Steve Traylen]

On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 20:24 +0200, Julien Pivotto wrote:
> On 12 May 11:04, BC wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie at inuit
> > s.eu> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Please remember that ze do not plan to expose that to users (e.g
> > > puppet
> > > will be installed in /usr, not in a SCL). However, those SCL will
> > > be
> > > used for dependencies and/or rebuilds of EPEL packages.
> > The big headline on softwarecollections.org is:
> > 
> > All versions of any software on your system. Together.
> > 
> > That is how I have always understood it. So how would installing to
> > /usr fit the SCL paradigm? Or has the SCL paradigm changed?
> We are not the SCL sig. We do not plan to let you install multiple
> versions of Puppet at the same time on your system.
> 
Hi,

Why not have multiple versions of puppet, it seems like a good idea.

But even with just one I would also put everything in the software
collection and just avoid the system, apart from anything else it will
clash with the epel pkgs and what not.



> Maybe a better way to rephrase it is:
> 
> which prefix will we use for our dependencies that are not packagable
> in
> the system?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel