On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Ken Dreyer <kdreyer at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:40 PM, François Cami <fcami at fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> The main Ceph Jewel installer is based on Ansible, so the Ceph part of >> the Storage SIG would like to be a consumer of the Config Management >> SIG Ansible bits. >> >> However, Ceph upstream has confirmed: >> * 1.9.4 and 2.0.0.1 are 100% compatible >> * 2.1 should work (but is quite probably not tested at all) > > I'm involved with this work a bit on the Ceph side, and Ansible > 2.0.0.1 is not something I'm testing at all; it's all been 1.9.x so > far. Maybe others are testing ceph-ansible on Ansible 2.x, but I've > found 2.0.x to be very buggy, personally. Noted. I'll use 1.9.x. Thank you, François