On 05 May 21:40, François Cami wrote: > Hi, > > The main Ceph Jewel installer is based on Ansible, so the Ceph part of > the Storage SIG would like to be a consumer of the Config Management > SIG Ansible bits. > > However, Ceph upstream has confirmed: > * 1.9.4 and 2.0.0.1 are 100% compatible > * 2.1 should work (but is quite probably not tested at all) > > This raises the following questions: > * would any member of the Config Management SIG be interested in > building and maintaining either 1.9.4 or 2.0.0.1 for the Storage SIG? > * if not, would the Config Management SIG be open to let Storage SIG > members maintain an Ansible 2.0 branch? > > Regards, > François > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel We are open to cross sig collaboration. We still have to decide which Koji tags we will need for the ansible sig. Once that is done, we will work on github where any contribution will be welcome. -- (o- Julien Pivotto //\ Config Management SIG V_/_ https://frama.link/cfgmgmt -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 303 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20160511/3df98c66/attachment-0008.sig>