Hi, That's exactly what I guessed that the issue was, because the RPMs seem to match (in terms of changelog at least) Thanks Mohammed On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Trevor Hemsley <trevor.hemsley at ntlworld.com> wrote: > On 15/11/16 16:16, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 15.11.2016 um 15:31 schrieb Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>: >>> On 15/11/16 13:38, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >>> >> qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.8.1.x86_64.rpm 23-Oct-2015 11:19 1.9M >> qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36 2.1M >> qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.7.1.x86_64.rpm 03-Feb-2016 16:51 2.1M >> qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1.x86_64.rpm 14-Apr-2016 12:16 2.1M >> qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53 2.1M >> qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.1.x86_64.rpm 24-Aug-2016 13:40 2.1M >> >> >> are this packages intentional (dist tag diff)? >> >> qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36 2.1M >> qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53 2.1M > > That looks to me like the > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36 2.1M > > was wrongly named and was then rereleased the following day with the > correct one as > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53 2.1M > > > Trevor > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -- Mohammed Naser — vexxhost ----------------------------------------------------- D. 514-316-8872 D. 800-910-1726 ext. 200 E. mnaser at vexxhost.com W. http://vexxhost.com