Il 15/Nov/2016 18:23, "Trevor Hemsley" <trevor.hemsley at ntlworld.com> ha scritto: > > On 15/11/16 16:16, Leon Fauster wrote: > > Am 15.11.2016 um 15:31 schrieb Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org>: > >> On 15/11/16 13:38, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > >> > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.8.1.x86_64.rpm 23-Oct-2015 11:19 1.9M > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36 2.1M > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.7.1.x86_64.rpm 03-Feb-2016 16:51 2.1M > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1.x86_64.rpm 14-Apr-2016 12:16 2.1M > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53 2.1M > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.1.x86_64.rpm 24-Aug-2016 13:40 2.1M > > > > > > are this packages intentional (dist tag diff)? > > > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36 2.1M > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53 2.1M > > That looks to me like the > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36 2.1M > > was wrongly named and was then rereleased the following day with the > correct one as > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53 2.1M > Yes. That's right. And we didn't notice the upgrade issue. > > Trevor > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20161115/5068a2ac/attachment-0008.html>