Le 15/11/2016 à 18:40, Sandro Bonazzola a écrit : > > Il 15/Nov/2016 18:23, "Trevor Hemsley" <trevor.hemsley at ntlworld.com > <mailto:trevor.hemsley at ntlworld.com>> ha scritto: > > > > On 15/11/16 16:16, Leon Fauster wrote: > > > Am 15.11.2016 um 15:31 schrieb Karanbir Singh > <mail-lists at karan.org <mailto:mail-lists at karan.org>>: > > >> On 15/11/16 13:38, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > >> > > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.8.1.x86_64.rpm 23-Oct-2015 11:19 > 1.9M > > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36 2.1M > > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.7.1.x86_64.rpm 03-Feb-2016 16:51 > 2.1M > > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1.x86_64.rpm 14-Apr-2016 12:16 > 2.1M > > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53 > 2.1M > > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.1.x86_64.rpm 24-Aug-2016 13:40 > 2.1M > > > > > > > > > are this packages intentional (dist tag diff)? > > > > > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36 2.1M > > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53 > 2.1M > > > > That looks to me like the > > > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm 08-Aug-2016 17:36 > 2.1M > > > > was wrongly named and was then rereleased the following day with the > > correct one as > > > > qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm 09-Aug-2016 12:53 > 2.1M > > > > Yes. That's right. And we didn't notice the upgrade issue. > Can't you rebuild the qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.%{?dist}.21.1.src.rpm with the el7 tag or bump the 31.%{?dist}.21.1 version to 32.%{?dist}.21.1 to fix this issue ? Jean-Marc > > > > Trevor > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-devel mailing list > > CentOS-devel at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel at centos.org> > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20161115/f96e323e/attachment-0008.html>