[CentOS-devel] Missing GlusterFS in 32-bit

Thu Apr 20 16:10:48 UTC 2017
Zdenek Sedlak <dev at apgrco.com>

On 2017-04-20 16:37, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> On 04/20/2017 09:55 AM, Zdenek Sedlak wrote:
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>> In this thread [1], they describe functional 32-bit gluster, so it
>> should work.
>>
>> How to add i686 gluster officially to the packages being built?
>>
>> //Zdenek
>>
>> [1]
>> http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2010-August/005129.html
>>
>
> 2010 !?!
>
> There are 32-bit builds of the current releases of GlusterFS for a
> several Linux distributions including Fedora, Ubuntu, and SuSE.
>
> None of them are "official" in any sense of the word. The ones we do
> provide we do as a convenience for the Gluster Community.
>
> And as Niels pointed out, we use the CBS to build packages for the
> CentOS Storage SIG. We get i686 packages for Fedora, Ubuntu and SuSE
> precisely because Bodhi, Launchpad, and OBS do produce i686 builds;
> CBS does not.
>
> If you're using one of the CentOS AltArch releases (aarch64, armhfp,
> i386, ppc64ls, and ppc64) then you're going to have to build your own
> packages. It should be fairly trivial to take the srpm from the
> Storage SIG repos and use rpmbuild to build it on your i686 system. E.g.:
>
> % rpm -i glusterfs-3.10.1.src.rpm
> % cd ~/rpmbuild && rpmbuild -ba SPECS/glusterfs.rpm
>
> HTH. Regards,
>
> -- 
>
> Kaleb
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Thanks for info, that was basically what I tried to find out.

No issue, I will set up i686 build environment and build gluster there.

I can publish it later in case of any interest...

//Zdenek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20170420/682d88df/attachment-0006.html>