On 11/08/17 12:13, Jacco Ligthart wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed a difference between ipa in git.centos.org and the src.rpm > used on buildlogs.centos.org. > > my guess is that the latest manual debranding was not pushed to git. > > > as a second item: any idea when we could have access to signed versions > of the src.rpms? I know that they might still change, but it would help > me for the redsleeve build effort if I had access to the current > (signed) set. > > Jacco Hi Jacco, the .src.rpm are only signed and pushed to vault.centos.org after the distro was validated by QA and so released. In the mean time, you can find ( as you did ) those on either buildlogs.centos.org (for x86_64) or armv7.dev (like https://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/c71708-pass-1/ipa/4.5.0-20.el7.centos/SRPM/ipa-4.5.0-20.el7.src.rpm in this example) But worth noting that both are also unsigned -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20170811/5ac53bc1/attachment-0008.sig>