On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: > >> On 15/03/17 16:58, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> > On 15/03/17 09:28, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> > >> >> So my understanding is that the problem relies on the fact that there >> >> isn't even a policy around Extras repository now. So it's up to the >> >> people allowed to build/sign/push to know what they'll add in Extras, >> >> and only in the arches they care about. >> > >> > https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories has a >> > definition for the Extras repos. on C7 it should include what is >> > upstream in the Extras/ repos ( provided we are able to build it ), and >> > other things that are needed sometimes to build content in base / >> updates. >> > >> > In addition to this, Extras should contain all centos-release-* files >> > from the SIG's. >> > >> > The only other content that should make it into Extras should be content >> > vetted by the core sig, considered fundamental to user experience or >> > tooling for user experience. ie. a fairly high barrier to entry. >> > >> > Does that give us enough policy wording for Extras ? Do we have >> > exceptions we need to work through ? >> > >> >> Sounds good. So with that definition in mind, how can we be sure that >> Extras is then built/distributed in parallel for all arches, so that >> then it can be safely enabled within CBS ? >> >> -- >> Fabian Arrotin >> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org >> gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS-devel mailing list >> CentOS-devel at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel >> >> > > Adding here notes I sent in a different thread, for reference. > I'm facing some discrepancies in repositories structure for ppc64le. > > In x86_64 qemu-kvm-ev is shipped within > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/ > which is the path I was expecting. Now, looking at ppc64le I see it > shipped within: > http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/extras/ppc64le/Packages/ > and being extras enabled by default it overrides qemu-kvm shipped by core > os. > Can we at least replicate the same structure between > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7 and http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7 ? > Any update? > > next, I see cockpit available for x86_64 in > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ > but it's missing in > http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/extras/ppc64le/Packages/ > > I see cockpit in fedora ppc64le: https://koji.fedorapr > oject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=869569 > so it should be possible to get it on centos as well. > Can you please build it? > > Any update? > > -- > Sandro Bonazzola > Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. > See how it works at redhat.com > -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20170508/4a9c88de/attachment-0007.html>