On 22/02/2019 15:10, Pat Riehecky wrote: > > > On 2/22/19 7:03 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In October 2018, we (pre)announced that we were working on a >> consolidated pagure infra for git.centos.org and src.fedoraproject.org. >> (https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2018-October/016997.html) >> >> We asked feedback from community and one of the remarks we had was about >> being able to follow commits for all /rpms/* > <snip> >> >> Worth noting that it's still only in staging, but once we have a green >> light, we should migrate git.centos.org to pagure with the same features >> set as the one deployed on staging. >> > > Will the centos-git-common tools be updated to use pagure, or should we > switch to another tool? > > > https://git.centos.org/summary/centos-git-common.git > Some tools (like get_sources.sh) will continue to work (already tested) but ideally all that should be handled by the centpkg tool (including the lookaside upload). Brian already mentioned it (see https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2018-November/017069.html) but he got no feedback (yet) ;-) -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190222/48016a78/attachment-0008.sig>