On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, at 11:47, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 19/06/2019 17:43, Brian Stinson wrote: > > > <snip> > >> > >> Does that mean having the add-ons like ha/rs going either to BaseOS (for > >> simple packages) or to AppStream (if built as modules") ? > > > > There are some HA and RT components that are shipped to CentOS BaseOS, > > but these are separate from the HighAvailability and RT variants in > > upstream. We won't ship the HA or RT variants. > > > > I mean RS and not RT, but same concept/idea :) > So do you mean that we have sources landed on git.centos.org, that we > have eventually built but that we'll not ship ? If so that contrasts > with what we used to do and would like to know why > > -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org > gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > *Attachments:* > * signature.asc To say this a different way. If it gets pushed to a c8 branch, it goes in BaseOS (again, an oversimplification because there are 1 or 2 exceptions, but close enough). I'd like to *not* maintain HighAvailability/ResilientStorage/etc. as separate variant repos in CentOS. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20190619/e1e57c11/attachment-0008.html>