On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 09:24, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 08:48, Fedor Piecka <teplavoda at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello > > > > > > I've been evaluating CentOS 8 for a while now. I found that pacemaker and pcs packages (aka "High Availability Addon") are missing in the default repositories. They seem to exist in EPEL. > > > > > > Is this a bug or an intention? > > > > > > > This is intentional. The High Availability Addon in RHEL-8 is a > > separate product line outside of the operating system so does not come > > across in the RHEL-> git.centos.org source feed. So the packages are > > not in CentOS-8. > > This is where smooge should read what package it was, go to confirm in > RHEL and then CentOS, and then reply. > > > OK so I was wrong and apologize for not doing my homework before > replying. pacemaker is a src.rpm which builds pacemaker-libs rpm which > is shipped in RHEL and CentOS. The missing packages are ones which are > not shipped in RHEL because they are in the High Availability Addon > product. So I think they are not shipped in CentOS because of the same > reason various other -devel packages aren't shipped. THey aren't in > RHEL so they aren't in CentOS. > Unless I'm misunderstanding, these add-ons have historically been included with CentOS... was this not in fact the case, or has something changed? (I specifically remember seeing haproxy from RS add-on installed from CentOS on a RHEL server because it wasn't available natively without extra cost.) V/r, James Cassell