[CentOS-devel] Pacemaker and pcs missing in CentOS 8

Mon Oct 7 15:52:52 UTC 2019
Christopher Voltz <christopher.voltz at hpe.com>

The packages are provided separately by Red Hat (two different
entitlements) but they have been provided by CentOS in the past as part
of the base OS:

  * http://vault.centos.org/centos/7/os/Source/SPackages/pcs-0.9.167-3.el7.centos.src.rpm
  * http://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages/pcs-0.9.167-3.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm

The pcs package isn't in EPEL or in the source or binary packages
released with CentOS 8.0. The package does exist in the RHEL HA 8.0
release so I suspect the missing packages from CentOS 8.0 are an oversight.

Note that the RHEL HA 8.0 release has 54 packages:

    awscli
    booth
    booth-arbitrator
    booth-core
    booth-site
    booth-test
    clufter-bin
    clufter-cli
    clufter-common
    clufter-lib-ccs
    clufter-lib-general
    clufter-lib-pcs
    corosync
    corosync-qdevice
    corosync-qnetd
    corosynclib-devel
    fence-agents-aliyun
    fence-agents-aws
    fence-agents-azure-arm
    fence-agents-gce
    libknet1
    libknet1-compress-bzip2-plugin
    libknet1-compress-lz4-plugin
    libknet1-compress-lzma-plugin
    libknet1-compress-lzo2-plugin
    libknet1-compress-plugins-all
    libknet1-compress-zlib-plugin
    libknet1-crypto-nss-plugin
    libknet1-crypto-openssl-plugin
    libknet1-crypto-plugins-all
    libknet1-plugins-all
    pacemaker
    pacemaker-cli
    pacemaker-cts
    pacemaker-doc
    pacemaker-libs-devel
    pacemaker-nagios-plugins-metadata
    pacemaker-remote
    pcs
    pcs-snmp
    python3-azure-sdk
    python3-boto3
    python3-botocore
    python3-clufter
    python3-fasteners
    python3-gflags
    python3-google-api-client
    python3-httplib2
    python3-oauth2client
    python3-s3transfer
    python3-uritemplate
    resource-agents
    resource-agents-aliyun
    resource-agents-gcp

Looks like all of these packages are missing from the CentOS 8.0 release.

*Christopher Voltz* <mailto:christopher.voltz at hpe.com>, Master Engineer
HPC Segment Solutions, Hewlett Packard Enterprise <https://www.hpe.com>

On 10/7/19 9:16 AM, James Cassell wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 09:24, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 08:48, Fedor Piecka <teplavoda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> I've been evaluating CentOS 8 for a while now. I found that pacemaker and pcs packages (aka "High Availability Addon") are missing in the default repositories. They seem to exist in EPEL.
>>>>
>>>> Is this a bug or an intention?
>>>>
>>> This is intentional. The High Availability Addon in RHEL-8 is a
>>> separate product line outside of the operating system so does not come
>>> across in the RHEL-> git.centos.org source feed. So the packages are
>>> not in CentOS-8.
>> This is where smooge should read what package it was, go to confirm in
>> RHEL and then CentOS, and then reply.
>>
>>
>> OK so I was wrong and apologize for not doing my homework before
>> replying. pacemaker is a src.rpm which builds pacemaker-libs rpm which
>> is shipped in RHEL and CentOS. The missing packages are ones which are
>> not shipped in RHEL because they are in the High Availability Addon
>> product. So I think they are not shipped in CentOS because of the same
>> reason various other -devel packages aren't shipped. THey aren't in
>> RHEL so they aren't in CentOS.
>>
> Unless I'm misunderstanding, these add-ons have historically been included with CentOS... was this not in fact the case, or has something changed? (I specifically remember seeing haproxy from RS add-on installed from CentOS on a RHEL server because it wasn't available natively without extra cost.)
>
>
> V/r,
> James Cassell
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20191007/2214fe62/attachment-0008.html>