On Tue, Sep 3, 2019, at 10:29, Honza Horak wrote: > A related discussion took place on this mailing-list in May this year, > witch a clear agreement that removing EOL content from the SCLo SIG repo > is the correct thing to do: > > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2019-May/017424.html > > I'd like to hear jstanek's opinion here as well, because he's handing > the SCLo SIG content recently more than myself, but I'm pretty sure the > SCLo SIG content mentioned below can be removed from mirrors and just > kept in the vault repo. > > It just looks like there were some unsuccessful efforts to remove the > content before: > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2018-August/016890.html > > so we'll see how it goes this time. > > Thanks, > Honza > > On 9/2/19 5:13 PM, Trevor Hemsley via CentOS-devel wrote: > > On 16/08/2019 02:48, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> For all the c7 SIGs, if you have content that you want removed (to make > >> inactive) when we create the new 7.7.1908 tree, please let me know here > >> what needs to be removed. > >> > >> If all files in a specific directory can be removed, you can just list > >> the directory. > >> > >> You will also obviously need to make any changes to your > >> centos-release-* files to remove those file locations from your repos. > >> > >> After we release 7.7.1908 .. we will copy over the SIG directories prune > >> the SIG content. The http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/<repo>/ paths > >> will then be shifted to the new 7.7.1908 tree. > >> > >> I expect that some time early next week we will release the CR content > >> .. with the full release coming 7 to 14 days after that .. so full > >> release likely some time between 29 August to 6 September 2019. > >> > >> If you don't tell us to remove content, we will move everything over as is. > > > > I have just done my point-release-expiration-check on all the packages > > in SCL. I xref'ed this list > > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhscl with what's > > actually listed by `yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=\*scl\* list > > available` > > > > These are the top level packages from that page that are marked as > > expired with their expiration dates from that page. This list covers > > more than just the packages I've listed there - for example > > maven30.x86_64 has 513 maven30* sub-packages and those will all need to > > be removed. > > > > devassist09.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > devtoolset-3.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > devtoolset-4.x86_64 Nov 2017 > > devtoolset-6.x86_64 Nov 2018 > > git19.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > mariadb55.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > maven30.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > mongodb24.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > mysql55.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > nginx14.x86_64 Oct 2014 > > nginx16.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > nodejs010.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > perl516.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > php54.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > php55.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > postgresql92.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > python33.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > rh-eclipse46.x86_64 Nov 2018 > > rh-git29.x86_64 Nov 2018 > > rh-mariadb100.x86_64 Apr 2018 > > rh-mariadb101.x86_64 May 2019 > > rh-maven33.x86_64 May 2019 > > rh-mongodb26.x86_64 Apr 2018 > > rh-mongodb30upg.x86_64 Apr 2018 > > rh-mongodb32.x86_64 May 2019 > > rh-mysql56.x86_64 Apr 2018 > > rh-nginx18.x86_64 Nov 2018 > > rh-nodejs4.x86_64 May 2018 > > rh-nodejs6.x86_64 Apr 2019 > > rh-passenger40.x86_64 Apr 2018 > > rh-perl520.x86_64 Apr 2018 > > rh-php56.x86_64 Apr 2018 > > rh-postgresql94.x86_64 Apr 2018 > > rh-postgresql95.x86_64 May 2019 > > rh-python34.x86_64 Apr 2018 > > rh-python35.x86_64 May 2019 > > rh-ror41.x86_64 Apr 2018 > > rh-ruby22.x86_64 Apr 2018 > > rh-ruby23.x86_64 May 2019 > > rh-thermostat16.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > rh-varnish4.x86_64 Nov 2018 > > ror40.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > ruby193.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > ruby200.x86_64 Oct 2016 > > sclo-ror42.x86_64 May 2019 > > v8314.x86_64 Apr 2018 > > > > Trevor > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-devel mailing list > > CentOS-devel at centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > With everything mentioned in this thread I've raised this PR: https://git.centos.org/centos/cbs-content-control/pull-request/9 We can continue taking removal requests here for a little bit longer. If there are any comments on things already removed, that can go in the comments on that PR. Cheers! --Brian