[CentOS-devel] Balancing the needs around the RHEL platform

Has this seriously devolved into a discussion requiring symbolic logic? 

I'm dusting off my copy from Virginia Klenk. 


________________________________________
From: CentOS-devel <centos-devel-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>
Sent: December 28, 2020 2:10 PM
To: centos-devel at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Balancing the needs around the RHEL platform

On 12/28/20 3:50 AM, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS-devel wrote:
> On 28.12.2020 17:34, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>> You keep ignoring 'no-cost' part there.
> It was said "or". "low- *or* no-cost..." Do you see? Not "and", but "or".
>
> Will I sound too unrealistic, if I say that "low-cost" would be much,
> much more probable?


That's a totally normal sentence construct for English speakers. It
implies that both will exist, and each will be appropriate for different
use cases.  It does not imply that "no-cost" may or may not exist, only
that it may or may not fit a particular use case.


_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel at centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel