[CentOS-devel] Before You Get Mad About The CentOS Stream Change, Think About…

Tue Dec 15 18:43:26 UTC 2020
Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu>

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:38 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 01:29:42PM -0500, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> > Thanks for admitting that the reason Red Hat did this was financial. This
> > BS about it being "a better way for Community input into RHEL" is just
> > that, BS.
> I don't think this is in conflict with the FAQ or what I have been saying.
> The FAQ clearly talks about "shifting resources and investments".
> However, I have seen many times people suggesting that this is intended to
> force CentOS users into buying RHEL. That really is not the case.
Yeah... right.

Forgive my sarcasm here, but Red Hat has earned it. "What does this mean
for CentOS? Nothing." "We will continue to support existing timelines."
Etc. etc. I trust Red Hat as far as I can throw them, and I am not alone.

> Matthew Miller
> <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel


*Matt Phelps*

*Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator*

(Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory)

Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian

60 Garden Street | MS 39 | Cambridge, MA 02138
email: mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu

cfa.harvard.edu | Facebook <http://cfa.harvard.edu/facebook> | Twitter
<http://cfa.harvard.edu/twitter> | YouTube <http://cfa.harvard.edu/youtube>
| Newsletter <http://cfa.harvard.edu/newsletter>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20201215/d5eed585/attachment-0005.html>