On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:38 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 01:29:42PM -0500, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > Thanks for admitting that the reason Red Hat did this was financial. This > > BS about it being "a better way for Community input into RHEL" is just > > that, BS. > > I don't think this is in conflict with the FAQ or what I have been saying. > The FAQ clearly talks about "shifting resources and investments". > > However, I have seen many times people suggesting that this is intended to > force CentOS users into buying RHEL. That really is not the case. > > Yeah... right. Forgive my sarcasm here, but Red Hat has earned it. "What does this mean for CentOS? Nothing." "We will continue to support existing timelines." Etc. etc. I trust Red Hat as far as I can throw them, and I am not alone. -- > Matthew Miller > <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory) Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian 60 Garden Street | MS 39 | Cambridge, MA 02138 email: mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu cfa.harvard.edu | Facebook <http://cfa.harvard.edu/facebook> | Twitter <http://cfa.harvard.edu/twitter> | YouTube <http://cfa.harvard.edu/youtube> | Newsletter <http://cfa.harvard.edu/newsletter> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20201215/d5eed585/attachment-0005.html>