[CentOS-devel] Question about NFS Ganesha [Storage SIG]

generally Niels does the glusterfs builds. I usually only do them when he's
on a long holiday.

He's not on holiday though, so I don't know why he's not on top of this.

But I built 8.2-2.rhel8 and tagged it for release.  8.2-1 was never tagged
for release by Nields.  8.1-1 was the last glusterfs-8 build that was
tagged for release.

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 12:07 PM Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com>
wrote:

> I guess only Niels is the only one who is taking care of the builds.
>
> @Niels de Vos , I hope you are well and just on a vacation.
>
> Best Regards,
> Strahil Nikolov
>
>
>
>
>
>
> В вторник, 27 октомври 2020 г., 14:59:58 Гринуич+2, Kaleb Keithley <
> kkeithle at redhat.com> написа:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I don't think it's a missing repo. I think the gluster packages need to be
> respun with the correct BuildRequires: resource-agents version for RHEL8.
>
> Niels is the one who usually builds glusterfs rpms for CentOS.
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:21 PM Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for your reply Kaleb!
> > I hope Niels can assist on this one.
> >
> > Maybe I'm just missing a repo and this is all for nothing :)
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Strahil Nikolov
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > В неделя, 25 октомври 2020 г., 05:02:50 Гринуич+2, Kaleb Keithley <
> kkeithle at redhat.com> написа:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:22 PM Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> ... when I specify glusterfs-ganesha.x86_64 (provided
> by centos-gluster8 ) - it requires resource-agents >= 4.2
> >>
> >> The last package is causing the dependency issue. Maybe I should
> address that to the Gluster Devel ?
> >
> > That's glusterfs, not nfs-ganesha; and, if anything, it's an issue with
> the Storage SIG gluster packages.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Kaleb
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20201104/6844f176/attachment-0002.html>