On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 9:51 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 9:03 PM Carl George <carl at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 7:01 AM Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > I see it here > > > > > > > > https://koji.mbox.centos.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=408 > > > > > > > > but not on the mirrors ... > > > > > > > > A retired package? > > > > > > Not retired, just a build that will never be shipped at this point. > > > > > > josh > > Since it was published at one time, and has now been deleted from the > public repos with extreme prejudice, in what way is this not > "retired"? > > I admit this is a first. I've never seen Red Hat or CentOS pull this > stunt. Has this *ever* been done before? > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > Retired would be if the package was removed entirely. `dnf install freetype` still works, therefore the package is not retired. The 2.9.1-5 build is identical to the 2.9.1-4.el8_3.1 build. We removed the duplicate (which follows what happened in the RHEL nightly compose). Why is this so upsetting to you? -- Carl George