On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 11:45, lejeczek via CentOS-devel <centos-devel at centos.org> wrote: > > > > On 13/11/2021 23:00, Carl George wrote: > > We're getting close to launching epel9-next (built against CentOS > > Stream 9), just currently blocked by a Fedora s390x infrastructure > > issue before we can finalize it and announce it. > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/UYRS43SV6ERPL2VIGR4XQACNHENFHH2N/ > > > > epel9 (built against RHEL9) won't exist until after the RHEL9 GA release. > > > > On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 12:51 PM lejeczek via CentOS-devel > and a month later... > It's taking somewhat long. > > I'll ask a question not just I must be thinking - obvious > rather - is that wise to let one arch be a such a blocker > for the whole lot? > It isn't blocking anylonger. You seem to have missed the various emails about EPEL-9 being built for the last several weeks. https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/9/ https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/testing/9/ https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/next/9/ https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/testing/next/9/ > many thanks, L. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -- Stephen J Smoogen. Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren