On 12/13/21 12:00, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 11:45, lejeczek via CentOS-devel > <centos-devel at centos.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 13/11/2021 23:00, Carl George wrote: >>> We're getting close to launching epel9-next (built against CentOS >>> Stream 9), just currently blocked by a Fedora s390x infrastructure >>> issue before we can finalize it and announce it. >>> >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/UYRS43SV6ERPL2VIGR4XQACNHENFHH2N/ >>> >>> epel9 (built against RHEL9) won't exist until after the RHEL9 GA release. >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 12:51 PM lejeczek via CentOS-devel >> and a month later... >> It's taking somewhat long. >> >> I'll ask a question not just I must be thinking - obvious >> rather - is that wise to let one arch be a such a blocker >> for the whole lot? >> > > It isn't blocking anylonger. You seem to have missed the various > emails about EPEL-9 being built for the last several weeks. > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/9/ > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/testing/9/ > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/next/9/ > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/testing/next/9/ Also https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/epel-9-is-now-available/ on December 3rd.