On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 3:55 PM IBBoard <centosdevel at ibboard.co.uk> wrote: > Is this normal? Does anyone know why there would be binary/library > packages but not devel packages published? The shipping of devel packages can alter a package's ABI support guidance[0]. If you need a devel package, please submit a request for it to become part of the release compose, either as part of AppStream or CRB: Quick link for EL8 (I have an identical one for EL9): https://da.gd/c8s-bugs Should that be rejected, you can request EPEL ship the devel subpackage instead[1][2]. [0] https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel8-abi-compatibility [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/ [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#RHEL_8_has_binaries_in_the_release.2C_but_is_missing_some_corresponding_-devel_package._How_do_I_build_a_package_that_needs_that_missing_-devel_package.3F -- Mike Rochefort