On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:40 PM Lance Albertson <lance at osuosl.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:32 PM Carl George <carl at redhat.com> wrote: > >> > Please do the same with the checksum file. >> >> I'm not sure I understand. The CHECKSUM file doesn't have a datestamp >> on it, and thus already is a URL that doesn't change. >> > > My bad, I hadn't noticed that :-) > Actually, let me clarify what I mean. The CHECKSUM file should also list the file(s) with the "latest" name in them for the check to work properly (I think). Otherwise it will fail using packer. Let me test it on my end to confirm that. -- Lance Albertson Director Oregon State University | Open Source Lab -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20210601/3ab87b90/attachment-0005.html>