On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:43 PM Lance Albertson <lance at osuosl.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:40 PM Lance Albertson <lance at osuosl.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:32 PM Carl George <carl at redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> > Please do the same with the checksum file. >>> >>> I'm not sure I understand. The CHECKSUM file doesn't have a datestamp >>> on it, and thus already is a URL that doesn't change. >>> >> >> My bad, I hadn't noticed that :-) >> > > Actually, let me clarify what I mean. The CHECKSUM file should also list > the file(s) with the "latest" name in them for the check to work properly > (I think). Otherwise it will fail using packer. Let me test it on my end to > confirm that. > Confirmed. This needs to have the "latest" iso file(s) in the CHECKSUM file as well otherwise it will fail. -- Lance Albertson Director Oregon State University | Open Source Lab -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20210601/8cc6ad1b/attachment-0005.html>