Would you mind opening a bugzilla for this? It's not something we can implement right away as we're pretty busy with 8.4 stuff, and I don't want to lose track of it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Red%20Hat%20Enterprise%20Linux%208&version=CentOS%20Stream&component=distribution On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 5:54 PM Lance Albertson <lance at osuosl.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:43 PM Lance Albertson <lance at osuosl.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:40 PM Lance Albertson <lance at osuosl.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:32 PM Carl George <carl at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Please do the same with the checksum file. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure I understand. The CHECKSUM file doesn't have a datestamp >>>> on it, and thus already is a URL that doesn't change. >>> >>> >>> My bad, I hadn't noticed that :-) >> >> >> Actually, let me clarify what I mean. The CHECKSUM file should also list the file(s) with the "latest" name in them for the check to work properly (I think). Otherwise it will fail using packer. Let me test it on my end to confirm that. > > Confirmed. This needs to have the "latest" iso file(s) in the CHECKSUM file as well otherwise it will fail. > > -- > Lance Albertson > Director > Oregon State University | Open Source Lab > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -- Carl George