[CentOS-devel] bind rpm conflicts - centOS 8

Mon Feb 7 08:36:39 UTC 2022
lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk>

On 04/02/2022 15:58, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 2/4/22 03:02, lejeczek via CentOS-devel wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I did not rush with this but now after a week and some - does anybody 
>> else sees it to?
>>
>> Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:21 ago on Fri 04 Feb 2022 
>> 08:57:59 GMT.
>> Error:
>>   Problem 1: package 
>> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires 
>> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>>    - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and 
>> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
>>    - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and 
>> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64
>>    - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and 
>> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64
>>    - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
>> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
>>    - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
>> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64
>>   Problem 2: problem with installed package 
>> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64
>>    - package 
>> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires 
>> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>>    - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and 
>> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
>>    - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and 
>> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64
>>    - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and 
>> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64
>>    - package bind-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires 
>> libdns.so.1115()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>>    - package bind-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires 
>> bind-libs-lite(x86-64) = 32:9.11.36-2.el8, but none of the providers 
>> can be installed
>>    - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
>> bind-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
>>   Problem 3: package 
>> ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch requires 
>> bind-dyndb-ldap >= 11.2-2, but none of the providers can be installed
>>    - package 
>> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires 
>> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>>    - package 
>> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.4.0+639+a88aab78.x86_64 requires 
>> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>>    - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and 
>> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
>>    - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and 
>> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64
>>    - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and 
>> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64
>>    - package bind-libs-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires 
>> libdns.so.1115()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>>    - package bind-libs-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires 
>> bind-libs-lite(x86-64) = 32:9.11.36-2.el8, but none of the providers 
>> can be installed
>>    - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
>> ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch
>>    - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
>> bind-libs-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
>>   Problem 4: problem with installed package 
>> ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch
>>    - package 
>> ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch requires 
>> bind-dyndb-ldap >= 11.2-2, but none of the providers can be installed
>>    - package 
>> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires 
>> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>>    - package 
>> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.4.0+639+a88aab78.x86_64 requires 
>> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>>    - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 requires 
>> bind-license = 32:9.11.26-6.el8, but none of the providers can be 
>> installed
>>    - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64 requires 
>> bind-license = 32:9.11.26-3.el8, but none of the providers can be 
>> installed
>>    - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64 requires 
>> bind-license = 32:9.11.26-4.el8_4, but none of the providers can be 
>> installed
>>    - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.36-2.el8.noarch and 
>> bind-license-32:9.11.26-6.el8.noarch
>>    - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.36-2.el8.noarch and 
>> bind-license-32:9.11.26-3.el8.noarch
>>    - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.36-2.el8.noarch and 
>> bind-license-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.noarch
>>    - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
>> bind-license-32:9.11.26-6.el8.noarch
>>
>> many thanks, L
>>
>
> CentOS 8 Linux is EOL and no longer on the mirrors.
>
> If you are using CentOS 8 Linux, youu need to replace it with CentOS 8 
> Stream, RHEL 8, or one of the RHEL 8 rebuilds.
>
> I am not getting this issue on CentOS 8 Stream.
>
But it's not CentOS EOL - system was 'swapped' a while go. This is 
on/from CentOS Stream.

Something - module? - must have not "migrated" over to 'stream'. This 
must be easily reproducible - have IdM up & working (from 'idm' module) 
on non-stream then 'swap'.

thanks, L.