On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 3:36 AM lejeczek via CentOS-devel <centos-devel at centos.org> wrote: > > On 04/02/2022 15:58, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 2/4/22 03:02, lejeczek via CentOS-devel wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> I did not rush with this but now after a week and some - does anybody > >> else sees it to? > >> > >> Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:21 ago on Fri 04 Feb 2022 > >> 08:57:59 GMT. > >> Error: > >> Problem 1: package > >> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires > >> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and > >> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 > >> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and > >> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64 > >> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and > >> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64 > >> - cannot install the best update candidate for package > >> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 > >> - cannot install the best update candidate for package > >> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 > >> Problem 2: problem with installed package > >> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 > >> - package > >> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires > >> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and > >> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 > >> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and > >> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64 > >> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and > >> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64 > >> - package bind-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires > >> libdns.so.1115()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >> - package bind-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires > >> bind-libs-lite(x86-64) = 32:9.11.36-2.el8, but none of the providers > >> can be installed > >> - cannot install the best update candidate for package > >> bind-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 > >> Problem 3: package > >> ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch requires > >> bind-dyndb-ldap >= 11.2-2, but none of the providers can be installed > >> - package > >> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires > >> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >> - package > >> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.4.0+639+a88aab78.x86_64 requires > >> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and > >> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 > >> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and > >> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64 > >> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and > >> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64 > >> - package bind-libs-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires > >> libdns.so.1115()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >> - package bind-libs-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires > >> bind-libs-lite(x86-64) = 32:9.11.36-2.el8, but none of the providers > >> can be installed > >> - cannot install the best update candidate for package > >> ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch > >> - cannot install the best update candidate for package > >> bind-libs-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 > >> Problem 4: problem with installed package > >> ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch > >> - package > >> ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch requires > >> bind-dyndb-ldap >= 11.2-2, but none of the providers can be installed > >> - package > >> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires > >> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >> - package > >> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.4.0+639+a88aab78.x86_64 requires > >> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > >> - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 requires > >> bind-license = 32:9.11.26-6.el8, but none of the providers can be > >> installed > >> - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64 requires > >> bind-license = 32:9.11.26-3.el8, but none of the providers can be > >> installed > >> - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64 requires > >> bind-license = 32:9.11.26-4.el8_4, but none of the providers can be > >> installed > >> - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.36-2.el8.noarch and > >> bind-license-32:9.11.26-6.el8.noarch > >> - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.36-2.el8.noarch and > >> bind-license-32:9.11.26-3.el8.noarch > >> - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.36-2.el8.noarch and > >> bind-license-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.noarch > >> - cannot install the best update candidate for package > >> bind-license-32:9.11.26-6.el8.noarch > >> > >> many thanks, L > >> > > > > CentOS 8 Linux is EOL and no longer on the mirrors. > > > > If you are using CentOS 8 Linux, youu need to replace it with CentOS 8 > > Stream, RHEL 8, or one of the RHEL 8 rebuilds. > > > > I am not getting this issue on CentOS 8 Stream. > > > But it's not CentOS EOL - system was 'swapped' a while go. This is > on/from CentOS Stream. > > Something - module? - must have not "migrated" over to 'stream'. This > must be easily reproducible - have IdM up & working (from 'idm' module) > on non-stream then 'swap'. > > thanks, L. Modulariety has interactected very poorly with mock since it was introduced. If you can test it with a local mock setup, I'd encourage setting "best=0" in all the .cfg and .tpl files until modularity is much more stable.