On Wed, Jan 26, 2022, at 14:22, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > Recently, the Hyperscale SIG created an infra ticket about a proposal to > change the rpm 'vendor' macro to be more specific than 'CentOS' for pgks > built on https://cbs.centos.org . > > For details, you can read https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/621 > > I think it's a very good idea as we also started to show a difference > between distro (/9-stream) vs SIGs (on mirror.stream.centos.org) so also > doing that at the rpm level (already using a different gpg key anyway) > would be easy enough to modify. > > Here is our proposal : define the default value for that rpm macro to > 'CentOS Community Build Service' instead of 'CentOS'. > > It's also possible to request a specific override (what we tested with > Hyperscale tags) and I'd even think it would be better to create > directly each new tag with a common pattern like 'CentOS <sig_name> SIG' > , which would be easy to automate when we have to create new tags. > > This is just a Request for change, that we intent to implement next > week, so if we don't have any negative feedback (we don't think people > are actually parsing that field - yet - ) about this change, it will go > live next week. > > -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org > gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > Attachments: > * OpenPGP_signature I think this is a good idea. Could be extra interesting for SIGs that cross-tag packages built in other SIGs. --Brian