On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:37 PM Brian Stinson <brian at bstinson.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022, at 14:22, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > > Recently, the Hyperscale SIG created an infra ticket about a proposal to > > change the rpm 'vendor' macro to be more specific than 'CentOS' for pgks > > built on https://cbs.centos.org . > > > > For details, you can read https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/621 > > > > I think it's a very good idea as we also started to show a difference > > between distro (/9-stream) vs SIGs (on mirror.stream.centos.org) so > also > > doing that at the rpm level (already using a different gpg key anyway) > > would be easy enough to modify. > > > > Here is our proposal : define the default value for that rpm macro to > > 'CentOS Community Build Service' instead of 'CentOS'. > > > > It's also possible to request a specific override (what we tested with > > Hyperscale tags) and I'd even think it would be better to create > > directly each new tag with a common pattern like 'CentOS <sig_name> SIG' > > , which would be easy to automate when we have to create new tags. > > > > This is just a Request for change, that we intent to implement next > > week, so if we don't have any negative feedback (we don't think people > > are actually parsing that field - yet - ) about this change, it will go > > live next week. > > > > -- > > Fabian Arrotin > > The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org > > gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS-devel mailing list > > CentOS-devel at centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > > > Attachments: > > * OpenPGP_signature > > I think this is a good idea. Could be extra interesting for SIGs that > cross-tag packages built in other SIGs. > > Yes, LGTM > --Brian > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20220127/7e8bb5ef/attachment-0003.html>