On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 6:42 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson at redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 6:29 AM Josh Boyer <jwboyer at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 9:27 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson at redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:51 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> The Red Hat Platform Tools team (who maintain binutils, GCC, gdb, >> glibc, >> >> systemtap, valgrind, etc.) have begun to move bugs from >> >> bugzilla.redhat.com to issues.redhat.com, to the project called >> “RHEL”. >> >> >> >> We'd appreciate if future issues discovered in CentOS Stream were filed >> >> there directly. When filing new issues, please make sure that the >> >> Security Level is set to None, so that others can contribute, and >> select >> >> “CentOS Stream” under Projects. Please do not use the public “CS” >> >> project for reporting issues in specific RPM packages because we >> >> (Platform Tools) do not monitor it. (Compose issues and CentOS Stream >> >> issues should still be reported in “CS”.) >> >> >> > >> > I am trying this with my personal account. >> > If I go to projects and search for CentOS, I ONLY get "CS", and it's >> not called CS it's called "CentOS Stream". >> > The only indication I get that it is "CentOS Stream (CS)" is when I >> look at the Key. >> > >> > Please, let us know how to REALLY get to your project on Jira. >> >> https://github.com/CentOS/docs-contributors-guide/pull/19 >> >> https://issues.redhat.com/projects/RHEL >> > > So, we don't search for "CentOS Stream" we are supposed to search for > "RHEL"? > > I'm sorry, I'm not meaning to be a pain. > This is the first group that has moved things from bugzilla to Jira, and > thus the first instructions. > I'm trying to look at this from someone who logs into Jira for the first > time, with no bookmarks and/or pre-defined looks. > > If I want to create a bug (or defect), or search for a defect on binutils, > how do I do it? > What Fabian said above, does not work for someone new to Jira. > > Now that I re-read the pull request, I see that the answer is in there. I have gone through the steps, and it indeed makes sense. I think a screenshot or two might be beneficial, but it works. Troy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20230823/de60f097/attachment-0002.html>