Hi Kaleb, Our company uses Ceph to provide storage to Kubernetes in all environments all the way to production. They are all on CentOS 7. We are currently getting ready to migrate to CS9 (which we have in many servers already) or RHEL9. We haven't found this issue probably because we are still in CentOS 7, and I don't think we install qemu-kvm on them either. I'm glad to hear that this was found. Thank you, Carlos R.F. On 7/11/23 04:45, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 6:07 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso > <amoralej at redhat.com <mailto:amoralej at redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've observed that a new build has been created in CBS > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=49831 > <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=49831> but it has > epoch 1 while a previous one has epoch 2 > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=40574 > <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=40574> so still the > old one is pulled. > > Apparently epoch was decreased in > https://git.centos.org/rpms/ceph/c/0ca9b1baa36c3e1184535f619cf82909616d1012?branch=c9s-sig-storage-ceph-quincy <https://git.centos.org/rpms/ceph/c/0ca9b1baa36c3e1184535f619cf82909616d1012?branch=c9s-sig-storage-ceph-quincy> > > > sigh. that broke between 17.2.3 and 17.2.4, almost a year ago, and > nobody has noticed. > > (I'm not sure what to make of that. It kinda suggests — to me — that > nobody, or very few people, are using storage sig packages.) > > Packages with correct epoch are building now. > > Regards, > > Alfredo > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 4:11 PM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso > <amoralej at redhat.com <mailto:amoralej at redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > After the update of liburing in centos stream 9, we are having > issues to install ceph and qemu-kvm together: > > # dnf install ceph qemu-kvm > Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:00 ago on Mon Jul 10 > 14:02:55 2023. > Error: > Problem: cannot install both liburing-2.3-2.el9.x86_64 and > liburing-0.7-7.el9.x86_64 > - package qemu-kvm-core-17:8.0.0-6.el9.x86_64 requires > liburing.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package qemu-kvm-core-17:8.0.0-6.el9.x86_64 requires > liburing.so.2(LIBURING_2.0)(64bit), but none of the providers > can be installed > - package ceph-osd-2:17.2.3-2.el9s.x86_64 requires > liburing.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package ceph-osd-2:17.2.3-2.el9s.x86_64 requires > liburing.so.1(LIBURING_0.1)(64bit), but none of the providers > can be installed > - package qemu-kvm-17:8.0.0-6.el9.x86_64 requires > qemu-kvm-core = 17:8.0.0-6.el9, but none of the providers can be > installed > - package ceph-2:17.2.3-2.el9s.x86_64 requires ceph-osd = > 2:17.2.3-2.el9s, but none of the providers can be installed > - cannot install the best candidate for the job > > Any help from storage sig will be appreciated. > > Best regards, > > Alfredo > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel at centos.org> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel> > > > > -- > > Kaleb > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_0x47EBED05C3375B1F.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 2484 bytes Desc: OpenPGP public key URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20230711/201edbaa/attachment-0002.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 665 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20230711/201edbaa/attachment-0002.sig>