On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 6:07 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've observed that a new build has been created in CBS > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=49831 but it has epoch 1 > while a previous one has epoch 2 > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=40574 so still the old one > is pulled. > > Apparently epoch was decreased in > https://git.centos.org/rpms/ceph/c/0ca9b1baa36c3e1184535f619cf82909616d1012?branch=c9s-sig-storage-ceph-quincy > > sigh. that broke between 17.2.3 and 17.2.4, almost a year ago, and nobody has noticed. (I'm not sure what to make of that. It kinda suggests — to me — that nobody, or very few people, are using storage sig packages.) Packages with correct epoch are building now. > Regards, > > Alfredo > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 4:11 PM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso < > amoralej at redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> After the update of liburing in centos stream 9, we are having issues to >> install ceph and qemu-kvm together: >> >> # dnf install ceph qemu-kvm >> Last metadata expiration check: 0:01:00 ago on Mon Jul 10 14:02:55 2023. >> Error: >> Problem: cannot install both liburing-2.3-2.el9.x86_64 and >> liburing-0.7-7.el9.x86_64 >> - package qemu-kvm-core-17:8.0.0-6.el9.x86_64 requires >> liburing.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed >> - package qemu-kvm-core-17:8.0.0-6.el9.x86_64 requires >> liburing.so.2(LIBURING_2.0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be >> installed >> - package ceph-osd-2:17.2.3-2.el9s.x86_64 requires >> liburing.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed >> - package ceph-osd-2:17.2.3-2.el9s.x86_64 requires >> liburing.so.1(LIBURING_0.1)(64bit), but none of the providers can be >> installed >> - package qemu-kvm-17:8.0.0-6.el9.x86_64 requires qemu-kvm-core = >> 17:8.0.0-6.el9, but none of the providers can be installed >> - package ceph-2:17.2.3-2.el9s.x86_64 requires ceph-osd = >> 2:17.2.3-2.el9s, but none of the providers can be installed >> - cannot install the best candidate for the job >> >> Any help from storage sig will be appreciated. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Alfredo >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > -- Kaleb -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20230711/39614151/attachment-0002.html>