For the record, we are also observing the same problem in CloudSIG
openstack-antelope testing repo:
[MIRROR] libsodium-1.0.18-7.el9s.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but
checksum doesn't match. Calculated:
1f2a5abe61bdd68bcbee962cf9a3b81158d1e5b987b24f421cb902924d75bb89(sha256)
Expected:
8147c75c0454e7e58f5ac3a351e08b8b734ac3ddef803885c085515523ad8327(sha256)
(14/194): openstack-barbican-worker-16.0.0-2.el9s.noarch.rpm
2.1 kB/s | 8.4 kB 00:04
[MIRROR] python-oslo-cache-lang-3.3.1-1.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading
successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated:
7344f476bdf799f62457a6a34bfee00a845656eca4b19429d25e97dfde1c2b38(sha256)
Expected:
125622fdeb3a2e02aa4cdcbc25a9a631677aba4c4de97d823ddb3c5230ecb714(sha256)
[MIRROR] python-oslo-concurrency-lang-5.1.1-2.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading
successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated:
cd53374a430a54df57a6482c2805e931dfd0030778a1a16fcf6e8b97a2dda69c(sha256)
Expected:
e0c44f79afc2568b30e85f3aeb128f375129694c77166bfa07a73c3bacd6bb53(sha256)
[MIRROR] python-oslo-cache-lang-3.3.1-1.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading
successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated:
7344f476bdf799f62457a6a34bfee00a845656eca4b19429d25e97dfde1c2b38(sha256)
Expected:
125622fdeb3a2e02aa4cdcbc25a9a631677aba4c4de97d823ddb3c5230ecb714(sha256)
[FAILED] python-oslo-cache-lang-3.3.1-1.el9s.noarch.rpm: No more mirrors to
try - All mirrors were already tried without success
My recommendation for users hitting this so far in CloudSIG or NFV SIG is
to move to release repos unless you want to explicitly test new packages
recently added to -testing repo.
Alfredo
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:16 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <
amoralej at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apparently untagging/tagging packages in the -testing tag is helping to
> fix the issue in some packages (ovn22.12, openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy,
> ovn22.09) but not openvswitch3.1-3.1.0-23.el9s.
>
> I'm currently untagging it to test the previous build.
>
> Note that in NFV SIG we are building the same packages in C9S and RHEL9
> buildroots with different disttag el9s vs el9. May this be related?
>
> Alfredo
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:53 AM YATIN KAREL <yatinkarel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Seeing similar issues in Openstack CI[1].
>>
>> For example:-
>> $ sudo dnf install --repofrompath=tmp,
>> https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/9-stream/nfv/x86_64/openvswitch-2/
>> --enablerepo=tmp --disablerepo=* openvswitch3.1
>> Added tmp repo from
>> https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/9-stream/nfv/x86_64/openvswitch-2/
>> tmp
>> 11 kB/s | 3.0 kB 00:00
>> Dependencies resolved.
>>
>> ================================================================================================================
>> Package Architecture Version
>> Repository Size
>>
>> ================================================================================================================
>> Installing:
>> openvswitch3.1 x86_64
>> 3.1.0-23.el9s tmp 6.8 M
>> Installing dependencies:
>> openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy noarch
>> 1.0-31.el9s tmp 14 k
>>
>> Transaction Summary
>>
>> ================================================================================================================
>> Install 2 Packages
>>
>> Total download size: 6.8 M
>> Installed size: 22 M
>> Is this ok [y/N]: y
>> Downloading Packages:
>> [MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm:
>> Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated:
>> 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256)
>> Expected:
>> 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256)
>> [MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm:
>> Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated:
>> 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256)
>> Expected:
>> 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256)
>> [MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm:
>> Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated:
>> 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256)
>> Expected:
>> 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256)
>> [MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm:
>> Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated:
>> 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256)
>> Expected:
>> 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256)
>> [FAILED] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: No more
>> mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success
>> (2/2): openvswitch3.1-3.1.0-23.el9s. 1% [-
>> ] 68 kB/s | 109 kB 01:41 ETA
>> The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
>> transaction.
>> You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
>> Error: Error downloading packages:
>> openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch: Cannot download,
>> all mirrors were already tried without success
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/2020304
>>
>> Thanks and Regards
>> Yatin Karel
>>
>> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 7:38 PM Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/05/2023 15:59, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Il giorno ven 19 mag 2023 alle ore 15:52 Troy Dawson <
>>> tdawson at redhat.com
>>> > <mailto:tdawson at redhat.com>> ha scritto:
>>> >
>>> > Those don't sound like CentOS packages.
>>> > Centos packages do not have dist tags of .el9s or .el8s
>>> > Please check the repo's those are coming from and contact the
>>> > respective repository owners.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Those are from CentOS SIGs,
>>> > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=39630
>>> > <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=39630>
>>> > https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=42936
>>> > <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=42936>
>>> >
>>>
>>> Can you elaborate where you're seeing that ? you mentioned oVirt CI so
>>> outside of centos infra (or outside of CBS)
>>> How do you test , from which repo, etc ?
>>> It's true that packages in -testing are now signed (it was announced
>>> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2023-May/142901.html)
>>> but is that for -release ? what about mirrormanager ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabian Arrotin
>>> The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
>>> gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Yatin Karel
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-devel mailing list
>> CentOS-devel at centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20230522/925a1a4e/attachment-0002.html>