On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:19 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:07 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > What is the planned c10s dist tag scheme? I've noticed many builds use > .el10+3 > > nowadays. Do we plan to ever lower that down to .el10? And if so, how do > we > > deal with the fact that .el10+3 > .el10? > > > > I believe the plan is to do a mass rebuild after disconnection to move > to .el10. That will raise the more significant digit (leading number > in the Release field) to make it effectively higher. > Neal is correct, but it will be a bit more. We will bump it once more to .el10+4 today, and do a mass rebuild (Using their own buildroots, and nothing from ELN). We expect that will take a week. We will then change the tag to .el10 and do another mass rebuild. In theory, everything should just build. We'll see how that is in practice. There will be a few more things we'll be doing, but in the end everything making it into -gate -candidate and -pending will have a .eln10 dist-tag. Troy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20240214/4df21d44/attachment.html>