[CentOS-devel] [EXT] CentOS 7/8s EOL : infrastructure impacts (please read)

Thu Mar 28 17:19:37 UTC 2024
Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org>

On 18/03/2024 12:59, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> On 18/03/2024 10:48, Peter Georg wrote:
>> On 18/03/2024 08.28, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> <snip>
>>>
>>> # mirrorlist.centos.org service :
>>> Starting from Stream 9 (and above), deployed CentOS instance ares 
>>> using Fedora infra mirrormanager instance for metalink= instead of 
>>> mirrorlist= in .repo files. We'll just decommission our mirror 
>>> crawler (also running with a mix of perl/python2 code), so not 
>>> validating any mirror for legacy/EOL releases. mirrorlist.centos.org 
>>> A/AAAA records will be removed in the following weeks after c7 will 
>>> be EOL'ed.
>>> That means that people still running CentOS 7 or 8-stream will not 
>>> have functional yum/dnf stack, except if they point to either vault 
>>> or have internal mirror but at least people would be aware that 
>>> distro itself is EOL and that they shouldn't expect to receive any 
>>> update anymore
>>
>> So SIGs building for RHEL8 might have to replace the mirrorlist= line 
>> in their .repo files (in case they provide any) by a baseurl=.
>>
>> Personally I'd prefer having SIG content built for RHEL8 being pushed 
>> to mirror.stream.centos.org due to these changes (incl. sources and 
>> debuginfo) just like content built for RHEL 9 and Stream 9.
>>
> 
> That's the second option on the table : push these to 
> mirror.stream.centos.org and so use metalink=, metalinks being served by 
> mirrormanager .
> I don't mind one or the other but for people used to eventually search 
> for src.rpm/debuginfo on vault.centos.org/debuginfo.centos.org for these 
> packages, suddenly they'd have to search elsewhere .. but one way or 
> another it's a small change anyway so I personally don't mind adapting 
> the releng process to push to mirror.stream.centos.org and so content 
> would land under https://mirror.stream.centos.org/SIGs/8
> 
> Let's wait on other SIGs' feedback (for those also building against/for 
> RHEL 8) and we'll have a final decision about the direction to take soon
> 
> 

No other SIG commented on the proposal so I guess Peter that you win !

Going once, going twice ....

-- 
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org]

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20240328/d833ba9b/attachment.sig>