[Centos-docs] Documentation Licenses again

[Johnny Hughes]

On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 11:01 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > Opinions, please.
> 
> Anyone?
> 

Personally, I think openpub is the best choice.  It is what Red Hat and
Fedora Core use on all their documentation.

It does require (though) a page that tracks version/revision with the
author listed, so may not be easily doable for a wiki.

It is what the "Managing Software with Yum" doc is licensed under (for
example):

http://www.centos.org/docs/4/html/yum/

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20061103/d4a96f7c/attachment.bin