[Centos-docs] Documentation Licenses again

[Johnny Hughes]

On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 06:16 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 11:01 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > > Opinions, please.
> > 
> > Anyone?
> > 
> 
> Personally, I think openpub is the best choice.  It is what Red Hat and
> Fedora Core use on all their documentation.
> 
> It does require (though) a page that tracks version/revision with the
> author listed, so may not be easily doable for a wiki.
> 
> It is what the "Managing Software with Yum" doc is licensed under (for
> example):
> 
> http://www.centos.org/docs/4/html/yum/

OK ... so I lied :)

The yum doc is released under this license:

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html

(Another one to look at) :)

All the RH and FC official documentation is openpub though ...

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20061103/d4ca54ee/attachment.bin