[CentOS-docs] Suggestions on "I Need the Kernel Source" Wiki pages
amyagi at gmail.com
Sun Jul 13 15:14:19 UTC 2008
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:02:09PM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Scott Robbins <scottro at nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 09:11:10PM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> When I come to think about it, building a custom kernel is not really
>> for people who require help at that level. Not that I am discouraging
>> it but, especially in CentOS, this kind of practice should be done by
>> those who know very well what they are doing.
> While I understand, I must (most respectfully) disagree in this case.
> The OP is a perfect example. He had valid reasons for rebuilding--the
> 30 seconds it would take to add the explation in the documentation would
> have saved him far more than 30 seconds--therefore, it's a profit. :)
I knew my comment would trigger some reactions (and I was right) :-)
But before my posting, I had already added a "back ticks" note in
parenthesis on that wiki page. Then Alan woke up (for people who
don't know he is in the UK) and made it much nicer.
More information about the CentOS-docs