I bugged Jim about this daily on IRC for a bit, and he had gotten some tractIon from legal, but that was several months ago. Again, a link to http://docs.redhat.com would be nice if nothing else. On Saturday, February 14, 2015, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 14/02/15 05:05, Peng Yu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I don't see the official doc for CentOS 7. Does anybody know where > > is it? Thanks. > > > > https://www.centos.org/docs/ > > > > and same for CentOS 6 .. it seems difficult to know what to do for > those docs, so I'd be in favor of either finding a solution (involving > lawyers) or just getting rid of that /docs (as it doesn't look nice in > the current state) > > - -- > > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAlTfCVYACgkQnVkHo1a+xU4JuACdFBDNKIdKswyw4JEU17ayXCA9 > QJcAoJWnSDZbRxFLv9XTSL83ndXAnVo9 > =FpVh > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs at centos.org <javascript:;> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20150214/6b647362/attachment-0006.html>