[CentOS-gsocadmin] Ping! [was:Re: Reviewing proposals]

Mon Mar 30 04:11:18 UTC 2015
Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

+1 Thank you for the reminder, Sankarshan, you are right on point.

We should proceed as below, and then work on our final-choosing
criteria and method in a week+.

On 03/29/2015 08:04 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to request the mentors to begin initial reviews and 
> assessments of the submitted proposals. For the first pass 
> assessments, using the "Private" comment section is acceptable.
> 
> During this period we would like to (a) identify the strong 
> proposal and thus a short-list; (b) identify the good alternatives
>  which make up the long-list; (c) cull the absolutely hopeless 
> ones.
> 
> If you do not have access to the Melange dashboard for The CentOS 
> Project, please get in touch with the OrgAdmins (Karsten and Jeff 
> ?) to get it sorted.
> 
> The GSoC timeline does provide a "Community Bonding Period". 
> However, using the window rolling up to the short list enables the
>  candidate and the mentor to be more familiar with each other and 
> also form a strong basis of assessing the ability of the candidate
>  to execute to a plan.
> 
> /sankarshan
> 
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay 
> <sankarshan.mukhopadhyay at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> With the cut-off date for submission of proposals behind us, this
>> is the time to review the proposals. Usually, this is also the
>> stage when the mentors can assess a student fairly objectively
>> while building up a rapport. It is possible that the review phase
>> will narrow down or, extend the scope of the original proposal
>> from the candidate. It is always a good idea to be mindful of the
>> fact that the candidates/students have other things on their
>> plates and as the GSoC term progresses, they may demonstrate a
>> varying degree of interest.
>> 
>> I will be spending a bit of today/Saturday and tomorrow/Sunday 
>> mostly putting in private comments around any aspect that may be
>>  a concern. Meanwhile, I will request the mentors (for the ideas)
>>  to take a look at the submissions. For the ideas which have 
>> received multiple suggestions, it provides the organization with
>>  an easy way to qualitatively compare.
>> 
>> /s
> 
> 

- -- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff
http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com
@quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlUYzOYACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEEYUACguln7YWHcsDb97iC65KgwpprG
0rEAoLYHFwCHW8J6UA93e4BEOL+2Adzp
=s7ql
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----