[CentOS-mirror] RayStedman.org Bandwidth

[Paul Mezzanini]

Personally I'm using the tc route to cap all off campus transfers to 150Mb/s

-------script I use-------
#!/bin/bash

tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10

tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:90 htb rate 150000Kbit

tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:90 handle 90: sfq perturb 10


#First mark EVERYONE
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -j MARK --set-mark 9

#now unmark who we "love"
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -d 129.21.0.0/16 -j MARK --set-mark 0

tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 handle 9 fw flowid 1:90
---------/script-------

I used to have a "! 129.21/16" rule but it was too hard to add
exceptions to.  That is why I now mark everyone and then uncap others.
 There was a really great howto I think on the gentoo wiki.

-paul
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Lauro, John <jlauro at umflint.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Dropping the DVDs would probably be more noticeable than the patches.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: centos-mirror-bounces at centos.org
> [mailto:centos-mirror-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of greg at raystedman.org
>  Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 6:13 PM
>  To: centos-mirror at centos.org
>  Subject: [CentOS-mirror] RayStedman.org Bandwidth
>
>
>
>
>
> Good Afternoon,
>
>
>
> We have excess bandwidth that we have been donating to the CentOS.org mirror
> for several months now.  We are starting to exceed the available bandwidth
> we have available on our server.  I performed some traffic analysis and find
> that on the 17th of April there was a significant increase in daily traffic
> from the mirror.  Our bandwidth consumption increased from 25GB per day to
> over 150GB per day and has been holding steady at this level.  Our monthly
> allocation of bandwidth will be exceeded if we continue at this rate.
>
>
>
> We would like to continue donating bandwidth to CentOS.org but we need to
> find a way to control the amount of bandwidth that it is consistent with our
> monthly allocation.  We currently support all releases and the DVDs.  Is the
> correct answer to reduce the amount of content we support on the mirror?
> Perhaps we should support release 5.x only?
>
>
>
> Please give me your thoughts on how to best remain below our monthly
> bandwidth allocation and support the CentOS.org community at the same time.
>
>
>
> Have a great day everyone!  Greg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  CentOS-mirror mailing list
>  CentOS-mirror at centos.org
>  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror
>
>