Brandon Davidson wrote: > I guess I never paid all that much attention to it before just now, but > has the CentOS 5 tree always been missing the HEADER.html and > HEADER.images links? It's not pretty any more :( > > Also, why are the directories inside /5 individually linked to their > current version, instead of directly linking /5 to /5.2 as was done with > the 4 series? No response to this? CentOS 4 just gets to be prettier than 5? Maybe I'll see if anyone bites on IRC. -Brandon